You are right, the excel 2007 formula is wrong.

Thanks!

i'm looking at Excel 2007 formula.

the IFERROR doesnt make any difference.

try this scenario:

1) move the B14 formula to H4

2) enter search ID = 4

3) u'll notice that it gives you the result as Green because the final formula step is =INDEX(Product,0,1) <-- the peculiarity occurs because the row syntax is 0.

Excel 2003's formula works though

Excel 2003:

=IF(SUMPRODUCT(--(C10=ID_num), --(C11=OrderDate), ROW(Product)-MIN(ROW(Product))+1)=0, 0, INDEX(Product, SUMPRODUCT(--(C10=ID_num), --(C11=OrderDate), ROW(Product)-MIN(ROW(Product))+1))) + Enter

Excel 2007:

=IFERROR(INDEX(Product, SUMPRODUCT(--(C10=ID_num), --(C11=OrderDate), ROW(Product)-MIN(ROW(Product))+1)), 0) + Enter

=INDEX($D$3:$F$6,0,1) <-- the row syntax=0 because there was no match.

however, it gets trickier.

if this formula is NOT within row 3-6, then it will generate an #VALUE error. (e.g. i put the formula at H8)

if i move this formula to a cell between row 3-6, the INDEX will pull the same value as per the row of the formula.

e.g. when the formula is at H4, the output is Green (D4). if formula at H5, the output is Yellow (D5).

so the question is, if there is NO MATCH for ID or OrderDate, how to output it as 0 (zero)?

thx

i've tried the formula. it works but only if it's on the same sheet as the data.

if i move the formula on other sheet, it failed on the INDEX portion.

if u need a sample file, do let me know. i'll upload it somewhere for you

thanks!

1) You say you prefer the first formula:=INDEX(Product, SUMPRODUCT(--(C10=ID_num), --(C11=OrderDate), ROW(Product)-MIN(ROW(Product))+1)) + ENTER

I modified the above formula to get the other two matching cells:
=INDEX($D$3:$F$6, SUMPRODUCT(--($C$10=ID_num), --($C$11=OrderDate), ROW(ProductA)-MIN(ROW(ProductA))+1), COLUMN(A1)) + ENTER.

Copy cell and paste it to the right as far as needed.

Remember, this formula can only match one row. If multiple rows match you need another formula.

2) I think you answer your own question. If the first formula works and is reasonable fast, I´d also go with that one.

above, there are 3 columns: [ID][OrderDate][Product].

search result would be in the columne where you put the formula in. <-- i call this [Result]

questions:

1) What if there are multiple columns? [ID][OrderDate][ProductA][ProductB][ProductC]?

this would output to [ResultA][ResultB][ResultC]

2) there are 3 methods above. I prefer Method 1 (plain 'ol formula only).

If I have 5000 (and growing) list of ID/OrderDates, which method would be practical?

thanks!